SAME PLAYS, DIFFERENT LANGUAGES
The key for an offense is to develop a system that can communicate the action plan or play to all the offensive players in a concise but still complete way.
The responsibility of creating the play calling language falls on the offensive coordinator. Most take various portions of play calling systems they’ve known before and create their own version. There are various methods for an offense to notify all its players where, for example, a running play is to be executed. Some teams use a numbering system, while others may use names. In numbering systems the “holes” or running lanes can be numbered from right to left, with 1 being wide right and 9 being wide left. Other teams number left to right. Some teams will use even numbers to the right (right guard is 2 with 8 signifying wide right) and odd numbers to the left (left guard is 3 and 9 wide left). Zero and 1 represent the center’s right and left hips, respectively. And, of course, some teams use odd to the right and even to the left.
And then there are naming systems. Instead of numbers, teams may use specific words to explain where a play is to be executed, with a category of names describing the play (examples may include cities, states, animals, etc.). Using states as an example, Ohio may designate an outside or wide play, while Texas may mean an inside play. If, say, Ohio means a wide play toward the tight end, Georgia may mean a wide play away from the tight end.
At times, a directional call is needed. Any pair of “opposite” words can be used. Common examples: red = right and blue = left or hot = right with cold = left. Teams usually settle on 2-3 ways to call a direction. Pass play calls are even more complex because they include not only the line blocking scheme but also the routes the receivers need to run to stretch the defense. Plus there are audibles (plays called at the line of scrimmage), which may or may not be changing the play. Remember Peyton Manning and “OMAHA”?
BEND, DON’T BREAK VS.THE ATTACK DEFENSE
While an offense needs to determine if they will be a ball control offense (stronger emphasis on running plays) or a more aggressive passing attack offense, defenses need to determine what style of play they want to use. The two basic styles are “bend, don’t break” and the “attack” defense.
The “bend, don’t break” defense focuses on the defensive players not allowing the opponent’s offense to make big yardage plays, the theory being the longer it takes for an offense to penetrate deep into the defense’s territory, the more likely the offense will make a mistake putting themselves into a more difficult situation to obtain a first down or to score points. The problems with this defensive philosophy are the defensive team’s offense will have fewer chances to score plus it can lead to the opponent’s offense dictating the tempo of the game.
In the early 1980s, the Miami Dolphins were very successful in utilizing the “bend, don’t break” philosophy. They had numerous experienced veteran players who were very good at anticipating how an offense would try to attack them, which led to the Dolphin players rarely being out of position. They would give up yardage but were able to capitalize on an offense’s mistakes to thwart drives.
During my four years with the Baltimore/Indianapolis Colts franchise, we were in the same division as the Dolphins, which meant we played them twice a year. In 1984, we added four new plays against the Dolphins when they visited us in Indianapolis. By utilizing these four plays throughout the first half, we were able to confuse and disorient their defense, which led to us being in complete control of the game. At halftime, the decision was made to go away from the new plays (I still don’t understand that one), which led to the Dolphin defense regaining their composure and holding us scoreless in the second half. Meanwhile, the Dolphin offense, led by Dan Marino, got untracked, and we ended up losing the game.
The opposite defensive theory is the “attack” philosophy. The goal of the “attack” defense is to impose its will on the opposing team’s offense. This philosophy calls for the defense (especially the defensive linemen) to penetrate into the backfield of the offense to disrupt the timing and to force the offense into making mistakes. If successful, an opponent’s offense can become very frustrated. But if the pressure does not disrupt the timing of the offense, the second and third line of defenders have much more ground to protect which could lead to big yardage plays.
The 1985 Chicago Bears’ “46” defense was an attacking style defense. Their alignment allowed their talented players to be blocked by one player at a time. Often, at least one of the Bears’ players would defeat their opponent, which would disrupt a play. In 1985, the Indianapolis Colts lost to the Bears 17-10 because we did not capitalize on two scoring opportunities. After the opening kickoff, we marched deep into Bears’ territory. We could not score a touchdown, so on fourth down we tried a short field goal, which was missed.
Late in the game, one of our receivers got behind the Bears’ secondary. Unfortunately, the pass was not completed. We had our chances but didn’t take advantage of the opportunities — a fatal mistake against those Bears because you weren’t going to get many.
PLAYMAKERS VS. STEADY PLAYERS
For a football team to be successful, the offensive and defensive units need a specific combination of players. Each unit needs to consist of three or four steady players and seven or eight playmakers. What’s the difference? Steady players put themselves into the proper position to make a play. If they fail to do this, they are more easily defeated.
Playmakers have the ability to overcome being out of position yet still be successful. Unfortunately they tend to be out of position more than steady players, which can create opportunities for their opponents. Why three or four steady players? If there are more than four steady players within a unit, that unit is less likely to make out of the ordinary plays. With fewer than three steady players, a unit can be very effective until their opponent gains some momentum.
To stop the momentum, playmakers are forced to gamble more. This often leads to the players being even more out of position, which creates more opportunities for the opponent’s offense. Just because a player may be classified as a steady player doesn’t mean he can’t make great plays, nor does carrying a playmaker label mean the player tends to be out of position too often. Mike Singletary, the Chicago Bears middle linebacker from 1981 to 1992, always seemed to be in perfect position while being very intense. That combination made him a steady player who was also a playmaker.
On the other hand, Jerry Rice, the San Francisco wide receiver from 1985 to 2000, would be considered a playmaker. He could shred a defense, but that happened because he was disciplined running his pass routes as designed which made him very consistent. He was a playmaker who was also a steady player. Only a few players have the ability to do both as often as Singletary and Rice did, which is why these two are in the NFL Hall of Fame and the vast majority of players are not.
FIRST NFL START
Five minutes before the opening kickoff of my second NFL preseason game, the coaches told me I was going to start the game at QB. That was OK with me and I was very excited. Early in the game, we faced a third down passing situation. The defense played a two-deep zone with man-to-man coverage on our five receivers. On the left side of the field, both of our receivers ran an inside (toward the middle of the field) route, which left that side of the field devoid of defenders.
I sprinted into the voided area on the left. Just as I recognized how open the left side of the field was, I experienced what felt like a freight train running behind me. Approximately 20 – 25 yards downfield, the freight train began catching up to me. Wisely, I ran out of bounds. It was at that precise moment that I realized just how big, fast and talented NFL players were. Oh, by the way, the freight train was named Lawrence Taylor.
DON’T BE A HERO!
Late in my career and as a member of the Los Angeles Rams, we were playing the Minnesota Vikings in Anaheim, California. We were losing 21-7 in the second half when our coaching staff made a change at quarterback. As I ran onto the field, my thought was, “Don’t try to do too much.” Instead, I focused on speeding up our tempo. This caught the Viking defense off-guard. We marched down the field, the drive ending with a touchdown pass to our tight end. Now the score is 21 – 14 and our crowd is getting excited. We kick off and one of our players crushes the ball carrier, causing a fumble that we recover around the Vikings’ 20-yard line.
As I ran back onto the field, the thought crossed my mind that if we scored, we would have a great chance to win the game and I might be considered a hero. We drove inside the Viking 10-yard line when a pass play was called. Instead of throwing the ball to a receiver who was on the goal line, I tried to throw to a receiver deep in the end zone. Huge mistake. The pass was intercepted, ending that drive and effectively taking away any chance we had to win the game. All because my mindset changed from “do your job” to “you can be the hero.”
BUILDING AN OFFENSIVE LINE
One of the most important but also one of the most difficult tasks in creating a good football team is to develop a solid offensive line.
First, you need five players with enough talent to play in the NFL. Next, the five players need to develop the trust and respect of the other linemen. And then, as a group, they need time playing alongside each other so they can develop the understanding and instinct of how their line mates will react in every situation. They have a split second to make the correct decision and then complete the block. If one fails, they all fail.
Some NFL teams have figured out what type of offensive lineman fits in their system. Every year they tend to have a solid group. Some teams struggle to figure out the type of linemen that fit their system, or they cannot find the linemen with the required skill sets. These offenses tend to be very inconsistent. For decades, the offensive line for the Pittsburgh Steelers looked the same. The players changed but the replacement had very similar skills as the previous player. The Steelers knew what type of player they needed for each of the five line positions, and they would sign players who fit their criteria.
During the late ’80s, when I was with the Cleveland Browns, we had a very solid offensive line. Most had been together for a number of years and had developed a solid group chemistry. Cody Risien was an extremely talented right tackle who was often tasked with pass blocking the defensive end over him all by himself. This allowed the other four linemen to work together to block the other pass rushers. In the running game, they were well-versed on how to block the defensive players based on how the defensive players reacted.
TRANSITION FROM STARTER TO BACKUP
When players join the NFL, they can find themselves in an unfamiliar situation. Most NFL players had great college careers, but instead of being on the field most of the time, they’re relegated to part-time duties. Not only can it be tough on the ego, it also limits the opportunities to improve. Because the starters take most of the repetitions during practice, the backups must find a way to maintain and improve their skill sets to ensure they can perform at their highest level if called upon. This takes determination, desire and consistent effort. Those who figure out how to be ready are often rewarded with longer careers.
During my first four years in the NFL, as a member of the Baltimore, then Indianapolis, Colts, I started the majority of games. Before my fifth year in the league, the Colts traded me to the Cleveland Browns, who had a talented second year QB named Bernie Kosar. Early in our pre-season camp, Bernie was named the starting QB. At first, this did not sit well with me. I had to change my mindset. The first adjustment was to convince myself that I was the starting QB but wouldn’t be getting much playing time. Second, instead of getting physical repetitions in practice, I had to take mental reps. I would stand behind the offense and “read” the defense to determine which receiver should be targeted with a pass. Learning how to practice the mental game helped me to produce when my chances came.
JOHN TEERLINCK
John Teerlinck was a former NFL player who became a well-respected and accomplished defensive line coach in the NFL. In fact, he was such a great coach, the award given annually to the best defensive line coach is named after him. In 1990, John was the defensive line coach for the Cleveland Browns. As the backup quarterback for the Browns that year, one of my responsibilities was to simulate our upcoming opponent’s offense for our defense. (The group of players who simulate an opponent’s offense or defense in practice is called the “scout” team.) Every Wednesday — which is usually the first day of an NFL work week — John would ask me to simulate some characteristics of our upcoming opponent’s offense. If our opponent’s quarterback liked to scramble, I was asked to scramble in practice. If our opponent’s QB stayed in the pocket, so did I. Sometimes John would notice a certain movement a QB would make just before the ball was snapped. He would ask me to simulate the movement in practice so our defensive linemen could get a split-second jump on the snap in the game.
Over the course of that season, John and I developed a great bond. After the 1990 season (the Browns won three and lost 13 games), John and I were released (fired) by the Browns. John quickly signed with the Los Angeles Rams. Luckily for me, he developed a friendship with the Rams offensive coordinator, Ernie Zampese. After John saw that I had been released by the Browns, he told Ernie that I’d be a good fit for the Rams. The Rams gave me a tryout and allowed me to be part of their 1991 preseason training camp. Because of John’s recommendation, I ended up as a member of the Rams from 1991 through 1993, my last three years in the league.
EMBRACE THE ‘NO ONE’ ROLES
One day while I was a member of the Cleveland Browns, Clay Matthews Sr. made a comment that has always stuck with me. He said he would rather be the “rush” linebacker instead of the “cover” linebacker. This confused me, so he explained. As the “rush” LB, not many fans see him unless he makes a sack. Everyone cheers the sack. As the “cover” LB, no one notices until he fails and the guy he’s covering makes a catch. No one cheers after that.
To be clear, Clay was a terrific player who was equally adept at rushing the QB and covering a receiver. There aren’t many like him. As a backup, 1 was always searching for ways to get onto the field. One of the few opportunities for a backup QB was to be the “holder” on extra point and field goal kicks. Like a “cover” linebacker, no one notices the holder unless he makes a mistake. In simple terms, the holder kneels on one knee approximately 7 yards from the line of scrimmage. When the ball is snapped, the holder has to catch the ball, place it on one end, rotate the laces away from the kicker and put the proper tilt on the ball. All of this needs to be completed within one second.
Fortunately, I was afforded the opportunity to be the holder for the Browns for a few seasons. During my first preseason with the Rams, I didn’t get the chance to “hold” for the newly acquired veteran kicker, Tony Zendejas. Instead, I held for a rookie left-footed kicker. During the preseason games, the first team (Zendejas) had a number of mishandled extra point and field goal attempts. After one last mistake in the final preseason game the special teams coach pointed at me and said, “You’re holding from now on.” And with that statement, I knew I would be a member of the 1991 Rams.
BROKEN NOSE
In the early 1980s, the New York Jets defensive line was called the “New York Sack Exchange.” And yes, they could put some serious heat on an opponent’s quarterback. Their left defensive end was Mark Gastineau. He was one of the NFL sack leaders for multiple years in a row. Since we played them twice each of my first four years in the league, he had plenty of opportunities to sack me. During one of our games in Indianapolis, his forearm “inadvertently” went inside my face mask, which broke my nose. (In today’s game, that would be illegal, but in 1985, not so much.)
After the game, one of our team doctors told me my nose would be off to one side of my face in the morning and to simply push it back into place. The doctor was right. A few weeks later, we were playing the Cowboys in Dallas. One of their running backs caught a pass near our sideline and our linebacker pushed him out of bounds. As fate would have it, the running back’s helmet hit the same doctor in the face, which broke the doctor’s nose. As he was lying on the sideline with his nose bleeding, I took the opportunity to tell him his nose would be off to one side in the morning and to just push it back into place. He laughed, got up, stopped the bleeding and finished the game on the sideline.
UNBREAKABLE RECORDS
There are two records of mine that will never be broken. In 1983, I threw the last touchdown pass in Baltimore Colts’ history. And in 1984, I threw the first touchdown pass in Indianapolis Colts’ history. Robert Irsay, the owner of the Colts at the time, packed up and moved the team from Baltimore to Indianapolis in the middle of the night on March 28, 1984.
AUTOGRAPH REQUESTS
Believe it or not, fans still send autograph requests through the mail, which I sign and return, time permitting. Here are a few pro tips if you’d like to get an autograph from a former player:
1. Don’t tape the back of the envelope. It’s a pain to open.
2. Try to provide a self-sticking SASE. It’s kind of disgusting licking a bunch of envelopes.
3. Don’t tell the ex-player how many years he played. We already know.
4. Provide a short, fun experience or memory. They’re a blast to read.